- From: Vaclav Barta <vbar@comp.cz>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:48:19 +0000
- To: www-lib@w3.org
Elliot Lee wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Sierchio, Michael wrote: > > > Proof that you *can* do OOP without an OOP language, but that you > > shouldn't ;-) > > More like proof that if you want to do implement an "interesting" OO > design, C gives you the flexibility to do such. :) > > It would not be any better in a language with OO syntax - there are too > many objects, they get strung together in rather strange ways, and a > hierarchy of objects is non-existent. There *are* hierarchies in libwww - anchors, for example. But what I miss most is apparent lifetime of objects. It would be great if I didn't need to know when to call HTProfile_delete, HTRequest_delete and all the other functions I don't even know about... Bye Vasek -- I have a search engine, too! http://www.locus.cz/locus/
Received on Saturday, 21 August 1999 01:59:09 UTC