Re: terrible

Elliot Lee wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Sierchio, Michael wrote:
> 
> > Proof that you *can* do OOP without an OOP language, but that you
> > shouldn't ;-)
> 
> More like proof that if you want to do implement an "interesting" OO
> design, C gives you the flexibility to do such. :)
> 
> It would not be any better in a language with OO syntax - there are too
> many objects, they get strung together in rather strange ways, and a
> hierarchy of objects is non-existent.
There *are* hierarchies in libwww - anchors, for example. But what
I miss most is apparent lifetime of objects. It would be great if
I didn't need to know when to call HTProfile_delete, HTRequest_delete
and all the other functions I don't even know about...

	Bye
		Vasek
--
I have a search engine, too!
http://www.locus.cz/locus/

Received on Saturday, 21 August 1999 01:59:09 UTC