- From: <darrochi@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:27:28 GMT
- To: scode@scode.webprovider.com, ylafon@w3.org
- Cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
Having used jigsaw for the past few months I can say that in fact it does work. I dont know about security because I have not tested it. I have used servlets extensively with no problems. Maybe somenone else has used it to its full capacity. I didnt notice any difference between my applet running on Jigsaw compared with running on a different server. Regards, Iain >> >>On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Peter Schuller wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've been wondering; why do all reviewers of Jigsaw seem to say "Hey, it's >>> great, but nothing I'd use!"? Everyone seems to agree that Jigsaw is very >>> advanced and "on the edge" in terms of features, but reviewers tend to say >>> it's nothing for big-time use. >> >>Well, some reviews stated wrong things, like lack of support for virtual >>hosts and other things. >> >>> Why? Is there something I'm not aware of? Isn't Jigsaw secure? Isn't it >>> stable? What? >> >>jigsaw.w3.org is running Jigsaw, and the latest downtime was when someone >>replace one lib that the jvm was using, causing it to coredump... It >>handles 20/30khits day with some servlets, CGI and even experimental stuff >>on a poor old sparc20, without any problem. >>Just to say that we are pretty confident in its stability, and no security >>problems have ever been reported. >> >>> So what am I missing? Is it just ignorance on the part of the reviewers, or >>> am I the one who's ignorant? >> >>I hope more people can give you feedback, as I am not in the best position >>to say that it works ;) >>Regards, >> >> /\ - Yves Lafon - World Wide Web Consortium - >> /\ / \ Architecture Domain - Jigsaw Activity Leader >> / \ \/\ >>/ \ / \ http://www.w3.org/People/Lafon - ylafon@w3.org >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 10 January 2000 08:27:52 UTC