- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:20:15 +0100 (MET)
- To: Peter Schuller <scode@scode.webprovider.com>
- cc: www-jigsaw@w3.org
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Peter Schuller wrote: > Hello, > > I've been wondering; why do all reviewers of Jigsaw seem to say "Hey, it's > great, but nothing I'd use!"? Everyone seems to agree that Jigsaw is very > advanced and "on the edge" in terms of features, but reviewers tend to say > it's nothing for big-time use. Well, some reviews stated wrong things, like lack of support for virtual hosts and other things. > Why? Is there something I'm not aware of? Isn't Jigsaw secure? Isn't it > stable? What? jigsaw.w3.org is running Jigsaw, and the latest downtime was when someone replace one lib that the jvm was using, causing it to coredump... It handles 20/30khits day with some servlets, CGI and even experimental stuff on a poor old sparc20, without any problem. Just to say that we are pretty confident in its stability, and no security problems have ever been reported. > So what am I missing? Is it just ignorance on the part of the reviewers, or > am I the one who's ignorant? I hope more people can give you feedback, as I am not in the best position to say that it works ;) Regards, /\ - Yves Lafon - World Wide Web Consortium - /\ / \ Architecture Domain - Jigsaw Activity Leader / \ \/\ / \ / \ http://www.w3.org/People/Lafon - ylafon@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 January 2000 08:22:24 UTC