RE: Request to review the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology

Hi François,

Thanks for this request. I have added this request to our review radar (https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1) and we discussed it in today's teleconference. 

Thanks for using the checklist and pointing up the one issue you're aware of. We'll endeavor to complete this as quickly as we can.

Regards (for I18N),

Addison

Addison Phillips
Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 12:53 AM
> To: www-international@w3.org
> Cc: 'Phil Archer' <phila@w3.org>; 'Armin Haller' <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>;
> eparsons@google.com
> Subject: Request to review the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
> 
> Hello i18n folks,
> 
> This is a request to review the Editor's Draft of the Semantic Sensor Network
> ontology:
> 
> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/

> 
> The specification is on its way to Candidate Recommendation. The Spatial Data
> on the Web Working Group does not believe that this ontology has i18n issues
> (with one exception noted below) and did not ask the i18n working group for
> review before today. My apologies.
> 
> The ontology describes sensors and their observations, the involved procedures,
> the studied features of interest, the samples used to do so, and the observed
> properties, as well as actuators.
> 
> The i18n issue that the group is aware of has to do with the Result class. That
> class separates actual values from units, using typed literals, which seems like
> the right thing to do. However, datatyping is not explicitly encouraged by the
> spec for the time being, and one of the examples in the spec currently uses a
> string without any datatype. This is being discussed in:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Jun/0023.html
> 
> You may raise i18n issues on the group's GitHub repository, which already has
> "i18n-comments" and "i18n-tracking" labels. The Spatial Data on the Web
> Working Group is tight on schedule as it needs to finish its work by the end of
> June. Let us know if there's anything we can do to speed up the review. I went
> through the self-review checklist but did not see anything that directly applies to
> this specification.
> 
> Thanks,
> Francois.
>

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2017 16:04:52 UTC