W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2015

[bp-i18n-specdev] legacy grapheme clusters vs extended grapheme clusters

From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:11:57 +0000
To: www-international@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-112365440-1445346717-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
frivoal has just created a new issue for 

== legacy grapheme clusters vs extended grapheme clusters ==
"Grapheme cluster" is often the appropriate way to define "character" 
in a specifications (such as CSS) which care about things readers 
visually identify as a character.

Maybe the spec should point that out, with a link to the relevant part
 of unicode (http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/ I presume). There is 
already a mention of that in the "Indexing strings" section, but not 
in the "Choosing a definition of 'character'" section, where it would 
be particularly relevant.

Also, providing a specific definition requires picking between "legacy
 grapheme clusters" and "extended grapheme clusters", and I am not 
sure how to do that. Guidance on this topic would be appreciated.

See https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/issues/1
Further comments on this issue will NOT be notified to this list. If 
you'd like to follow the discussion, please do so by subscribing to 
the issue via the above link. Do not reply to this email.
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:12:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:09 UTC