- From: via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 09:14:20 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
i thought about using 'syntax' or 'syntactic elements', and thought that 'syntactic content' was better. 'syntax' is for me a bit too general a word, whose dictionary definition relates to more than we need. 'syntactic elements' seemed too vague, and when used in charmod-fun (once only) i think that 'elements' is just a general word, rather than part of a technical term. 'syntactic content' is an unusual pairing which makes it more recognisable and specific for what we need, with less chance for confusion, but in particular it contrasts with and nicely complements 'natural language content', which is the term we use for the rest of the stuff in a resource. -- GitHub Notif of comment by r12a See https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/13#issuecomment-127926894
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 09:14:21 UTC