[charmod-norm] Is 'syntactic content' a better term than 'markup'?

• From: via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:14:28 +0000
• To: www-international@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issues.opened-98993625-1438701267-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

r12a has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm:

== Is 'syntactic content' a better term than 'markup'? ==
while cross-referencing with Charmod Fundamentals, i noticed that they
 refer to syntax and syntactic elements.  It seemed to me that 
'syntactic content' (cf. 'natural language content') might be clearer 
than 'markup' for our purposes.  There'd be less overloading.

See https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/13

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2015 15:14:30 UTC