- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 01:11:22 +0000
- To: www-international@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28261 Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |addison@lab126.com, | |www-international@w3.org --- Comment #2 from Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> --- (In reply to Philip Jägenstedt from comment #1) > I think the syntax should say that if interpreted as a real number, a WebVTT > percentage must in the range 0..100, matching the parsing. > > This still makes 0000050% valid, which seems OK If we want it to not be > valid we'd have to say that the first digit cannot be a zero. A percentage can never be larger than 100%? Some CSS percentages make sense as larger numbers... just not as unbounded values. Anyway, this comment is just a grammatical nit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 01:11:24 UTC