W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Selection on text with ruby

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:31:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbX1RvbodJVT1n5u_rh_sz=vMuun0yp8iGPedSzYZqM4vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Cc: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>, www International <www-international@w3.org>, Shinyu Murakami <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
There was a similar discussion for what Text-to-Speech should read. In
most cases, people wants TTS to skip <rt>.

In rare cases, where annotation is really an annotation, not phonetic,
they want TTS to read them.

So, probably, should skip by default, and may add something if it
helps a11y? I'm not following where that discussion went.

/koji

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Selection" and "copying to plain text" are two different things.
>>
>> How to plain-text-ize HTML is not in the scope of the spec as far as I
>> understand, at least as of today, so it's up to UA to decide what to
>> do.
>
>
> I realize that. I sent this email because I want to know what would be the
> most sensible way to handle this.
>
> - Xidorn
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 04:31:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:38 UTC