- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:06:19 +0000
- To: Gunnar Bittersmann <gunnar@bittersmann.de>, www-international@w3.org
The first link has a class of termref, so it should point to a definition of byte-order mark. I fixed it so that it linked to a more specific part of the BOM article. The second link, therefore, still stands, as it suggests that the reader explore the byte-order mark in a more general fashion. RI On 10/03/2014 05:26, Gunnar Bittersmann wrote: > In qa-css-charset-new, the first sentence under What about the > byte-order mark? > http://dev.bittersmann.de/International/questions/qa-css-charset-new.de#bom > already includes a link to qa-byte-order-mark. The last sentence of this > section (“Read more about the byte-order mark.”) is redundant and can be > removed. > > Or don’t link from the first sentence. > > For the correspondent section in qa-html-encoding-declarations-new > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-html-encoding-declarations-new#bom, > you might also consider to make “byte-order mark” or “UTF-8 byte-order > mark” in the first sentence the link and remove the last one (“Read more > about the byte-order mark.”). > > Gunnar > >
Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 13:06:50 UTC