W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2014

[counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa?

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:15:14 +0000
Message-ID: <52FE8762.3060504@w3.org>
To: www International <www-international@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
6.2 Alphabetic: lower-alpha, lower-latin, upper-alpha, upper-latin, 
lower-greek, hiragana, hiragana-iroha, katakana, katakana-iroha

The hiragana, katakana, hiragana-iroha, and katakana-iroha seem to be 
implemented in the same way in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and now Opera. 
The implementation differs from the spec only by the addition of one or 
two characters to the basic set.

Should we change the spec to align with the implementations?

For more information see the test results at

(This comment has not been reviewed by the i18n WG)
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 21:15:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:41:04 UTC