Re: [css-fonts-3] i18n-ISSUE-300: ja-jp too verbose

> Im as confused as Jens. No need for JP and keeping language tags as short as possible means to prefer *:lang(ja) over *:lang(ja-jp).

It would be better, Japanese is normalize everywhere.

> And wouldnt an example using *:lang(zh-Hant) be more appropriate than *:lang(zh-tw)?

But I don't agree replace zh-tw by zh-Hant, because zh-Hant is used in Hongkong and Taiwan. 

There are some glyphs come from Cantonese just used on Hongkong's context, Not all Traditional Chinese font contains those glyphs.

So zh-tw and zh-hk would be better for usage.

Gunnar Bittersmann <>  2013/9/13 U4:15 gDG

> > *:lang(ja-jp) would be better as *:lang(ja) - there is no need for the
> > jp, and the general recommendation is to keep the language tag as short
> > as possible.
> Gunnar

Received on Saturday, 14 September 2013 04:38:33 UTC