- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:43:54 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
[resend with correct subject line] On 12/09/2013 19:34, Richard Ishida wrote: > 5.3. Cluster matching > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/#cluster-matching > > > In the numbered list, what should follow if 1b holds true? > > "If a sequence of multiple codepoints is canonically equivalent to a > single character and the font supports that character, select this font > for the sequence." > > Is this implying (though not stating, note), that the text should be > normalized so that the glyph for the canonically equivalent character > can be used? (I'm not sure that's a good idea.) > > Or is the meaning that if the font has a glyph for the precomposed > character that is canonically equivalent to the sequence of characters, > then that glyph should be used (without changing the sequence of > characters itself). That would seem to make more sense. > > Otherwise, it's not clear why you would select the font for this sequence. > > > (after i18n WG discussion) > > -- Richard Ishida
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2013 18:44:22 UTC