- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:42:24 +0900
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
I have listed this as http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#ZWNJ-ZWJ-111. Regards, Martin. At 10:54 05/08/17, Martin Duerst wrote: > >The IRI spec doesn't say anything about ZWJ/ZWNJ, and so >it can be said to be "at least not wrong". IRIs, except >for transcoding issues from legacy encodings and those >parts that are case-insensitive, are always compared >codepoint by codepoint. I guess Unicode should fix their >text about ZWJ/ZWNJ, but there is nothing in the IRI >spec (as far as I see) that needs fixing for this issue. > >Regards, Martin. > >At 17:32 05/08/16, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >Hi, > > > >This came up at the unicode list. I'm not sure if is an issue for IRI / > >the future development of the IRI spec, but I'm bringing it to the > >attention of www-international and public-iri. Any comments? > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 08:45:50 UTC