- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:56:18 +0900
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- CC: "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Martin Duerst wrote: > I have listed this as http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#ZWNJ-ZWJ-111. > > Regards, Martin. > > At 10:54 05/08/17, Martin Duerst wrote: > >> The IRI spec doesn't say anything about ZWJ/ZWNJ, and so >> it can be said to be "at least not wrong". IRIs, except >> for transcoding issues from legacy encodings and those >> parts that are case-insensitive, are always compared >> codepoint by codepoint. I guess Unicode should fix their >> text about ZWJ/ZWNJ, but there is nothing in the IRI >> spec (as far as I see) that needs fixing for this issue. >> I agree with your explanation, Martin. Thank you & regards, Felix >> Regards, Martin. >> >> At 17:32 05/08/16, Felix Sasaki wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This came up at the unicode list. I'm not sure if is an issue for IRI / >>> the future development of the IRI spec, but I'm bringing it to the >>> attention of www-international and public-iri. Any comments? >>> > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp > > >
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 11:56:30 UTC