- From: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:38:35 -0500
- To: cowan@ccil.org
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
> >CE Whitehead scripsit: Sorry to get back so late > > > what is needed is a pictorial icon; > >But why? Well if there were one, but I agree the flag is problematic > > > "English" (in English) ||| "Francais" (in French) > > > > also would help--as the person looking for a text in a language should > > at least be able to read the language name in that language, so this. > >That was Jukka Korpela's suggestion. Right. I was rephrasing it. The point is to use the language of the speakers in question. > > > the U.S. > > [which sort of still has but one], > >The U.S. has no official language. Certain states have either English >(26), >English and Spanish (1), or English and Hawaiian (1) as official languages; >the remaining states (22) have no official language. Thanks for the correction; you're right; the states had to introduce initiatives to make English official state by state. I guess there is official and unofficial language policy; I was talking about unofficial policy (the language on traffic signs; in Israel-falestine there are three languages on these always, but it's a tiny country, easy to do there; the language on voter information--in some states--there are states where this is done in several languages, on ballots; to be fair, in HRS offices in Florida information has often been in two or three languages--Haitian Creole for those who read it, Spanish, and English; at least that is what I remember seeing there long ago during my 6-month stint getting food stamps and cashing them in for brownies taking the change and doing laundry, paying on a loan, and using it for job hunting; Florida is otherwise unofficially semi-monolingual but of course businesses and such use whatever language they choose) but I was in a state that introduced an official English policy amendment, yes. > > > But does this debate go here?? Or do we just look over/approve variant > > subtags and nothing else? > >Umm, this is www-international, not ietf-languages. Oops. Sorry. --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar@hotmail.com > >-- >A rose by any other name John Cowan >may smell as sweet, >http://www.ccil.org/~cowan >but if you called it an onion cowan@ccil.org >you'd get cooks very confused. --RMS _________________________________________________________________ Rates near 39yr lows! $430K Loan for $1,399/mo - Paying Too Much? Calculate new payment http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18226&moid=7581
Received on Saturday, 10 March 2007 17:39:02 UTC