- From: Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:05:02 +0200
- To: atom-syntax@imc.org, www-international@w3.org
- To: atom-syntax=40imc.org@wiggum.w3.org, www-international=40w3.org@wiggum.w3.org
- Cc: public-i18n-geo@w3.org
Copy to: public-i18n-geo@w3.org James Snell wrote in http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg18925.html > To: atom-syntax atom-syntax@imc.org > Subject: Atom bidi > From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:20:28 -0700 > As an alternative to adding the dir attribute to rfc4287, I've published > draft-snell-atompub-bidi-00.txt as an extension in a separate namespace. > > As always, feedback is requested and welcome. > > - James > > -------- Original Message -------- > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : Atom Bidirectional Extension > Author(s) : J. Snell > Filename : draft-snell-atompub-bidi-00.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2006-10-13 > > This document describes an extension to the Atom format that can be > used to define the base directionality of directionally-neutral > characters contained within an Atom document. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-bidi-00.txt > The goal and the draft seem good to me. There are at least 4 specifications to define the directionality of text in xml format: specification: Atom Bidirectional Extension URI: urn:ietf:id:draft-snell-atompub-bidi urn:ietf:id:draft-snell-atompub-bidi-00 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-bidi* attribute: dir values: ltr, rtl, lro, rlo xml namespace: http://purl.org/atompub/bidi status: working draft specification: XHTML 1.0 URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801 attribute: dir values: ltr, rtl xml namespace: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml status: usable specification: XHTML 2.0 URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-bidi.html#adef_bidi_dir http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-bidi.html#adef_bidi_dir attribute: dir values: ltr, rtl, lro, rlo xml namespace: http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/ status: working draft specification: Internationalization Tag Set 1.0 URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#dir-sec http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/#dir-sec attribute: dir values: ltr, rtl, lro, rlo xml namespace: http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its status: working draft editor: W3C Internationalization Tag Set working group http://www.w3.org/International/its/ XHTML 1.0 is the only specification which is not a working draft, but its dir attribute does not allow "lro" and "rlo" values. I do not guess XHTML 2.0 will be usable before a long time. What are the roadmap for "Atom Bidirectional Extension" and "Internationalization Tag Set 1.0" ? On the today speed, when are they sheduled, when can we hope, that it will be internet^W xml standard and published as "W3C Recommendation" or "IETF RFC" ? Could it be avoided having two spec for the same purpose ? See also - Richard Ishida, "What you need to know about the bidi algorithm and inline markup", http://www.w3.org/International/articles/inline-bidi-markup/ - W3C Internationalization Tag Set working group, "Best Practices for XML Internationalization", section 2.2 "Provide a way to specify text directionality", http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#DevDir - James Snell, "Adding bidi support to Atom", http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=470 - James Snell, "Atom Bidirectional Extension", http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=484 - "PaceAtomBidi", http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAtomBidi - "FAQ: Bidi formatting codes vs. markup in (X)HTML", http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-controls - "FAQ: CSS vs. markup for bidi support", http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-bidi-css-markup
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 13:07:54 UTC