W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2005

FW: IRIEverywhere-27 (was: Re: Agenda of 13 December 2005 TAG teleconference)

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:14:28 +0000
To: www-international@w3.org
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D80C87B10@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Any comments from the I18N Core WG?


-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann
Sent: 13 December 2005 12:08
To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: IRIEverywhere-27 (was: Re: Agenda of 13 December 2005 TAG teleconference)

* Vincent Quint wrote:
>             *  1. Issue IRIEverywhere-27[17]: long discussion[18] in
>                Edinburgh

I could not find an agenda or minutes of that meeting in the www-tag
archives... I am surprised to see "the original question was, should XML
use IRI? Now that it has a definition that's been agreed upon, yes, they

As XML and most formats based on XML allow use of non-Unicode encodings,
allowing IRIs in such formats would make the formats inconsistent with
the architectural requirements set forth in the reference processing
model http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-RefProcModel
and http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#C014 in particular.

I don't think the reference character processing model should be changed
and it seems inappropriate for the TAG to encourage creating formats
that violate absolute requirements of W3C's own Character Model for the
World Wide Web. So I don't think the TAG's resolution should be as cited
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 12:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:51 UTC