- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:45:19 +0900
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Cc: www-international@w3.org
At 22:14 05/10/04, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > >Thanks to all; comments have been helpful. > >In response to Martin's question about change to Jena ... > >We are currently thinking about doing a rather better job of IRI support than we have at the moment; it is not yet specified, but would minimally: >- be based on RFC 3987 (and 3986) >- also support the 'legacy' concept of RDF URI Reference, but warn when a non-IRI, RDF URI Reference occurs. > >It would be best if it could offer the sort of analysis that went into this support request. > >I think from our point of view there are some clear advantages to IRIs. >Is there an off-the-shelf open source Java package that does say the equivalent of java.net.URI with the various IRI nuances. Not that I know. But I'll have somebody here check it out. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 08:13:40 UTC