- From: Carl W. Brown <cbrown@xnetinc.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:56:53 -0700
- To: <www-international@w3.org>
Mark, > People may differ in what they think of as a locale. We tend to take a > narrow view, that it is principally items that differ according to > language, thus excluding other items like preferred timezone, > preferred currency, preferred character set, smoker/non-smoker > preference, meal preference (vegetarian, kosher, etc.), music > preference, religion, party affiliation, favorite charity, etc. > > It is not that these other items may not be important; they may very > well be, depending on the application. And thus one may need to > communicate them. But they don't necessarily belong in an > all-encompassing 'locale'. You are right that you have to draw the line somewhere. I used to think of time zones as separate from locales until I became more familiar with Olsen time zones. He establishes times zones that are unique subdivisions within a country. This makes sense since each country has political control over time zones. The time zone parameters are regional data within the country data. It is sub-country data like language within a country may vary to produce sub-languages. Carl
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2003 10:56:59 UTC