- From: Erik van der Poel <erik@netscape.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 09:49:09 -0700
- To: Deke Smith <deke@tallent.com>
- CC: www-international@w3.org
Deke Smith wrote: > > One source said that Windows uses ISO-8859-1 for its English-language > system, then I saw a thread about the Windows-1252 encoding and how it > differs from ISO-8859-1. Windows uses a superset of ISO-8859-1 called CP 1252, aka "windows-1252". > Does Windows 3.x/DOS use the same encoding as Windows 95/98? Windows 3.x probably uses a subset of the current CP 1252, but still a superset of ISO-8859-1. CP 1252 has been growing over the years. DOS uses a number of different code pages. For English, if I remember correctly, it uses mostly CP 937. > I have read > that WinNT uses Unicode, but is the default encoding under the English > language system different than the other flavors of Win/DOS? Windows NT uses Unicode internally and in the file system. But you can still use CP 1252 files, such as text files and HTML files. > IANA lists > "Windows-1250", "Windows-1254", etc. but does not list our friend, > "Windows-1252". Microsoft registered all the windows-125x charsets, and tried to register windows-1252 too, but for some reason that hasn't happened. > On the Mac, the English encoding is called "MacRoman" by the browsers, > news clients and email clients. IANA does not list "MacRoman" as an > encoding scheme, instead it lists, "Macintosh". Which is the acceptable > usage? As far as the charset name is concerned, "macintosh" is correct from IANA's point of view. Netscape only supports the name "x-mac-roman". However, from the interoperability point of view, it might be better not to use Mac Roman on the Net. ISO-8859-1 is used much more widely. Erik
Received on Friday, 28 August 1998 12:49:08 UTC