- From: Martin J. Duerst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:42:38 +0100 (MET)
- To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- cc: ftang@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-international@www10.w3.org, Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com, bobj@netscape.com, Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr, Ed_Batutis/CAM/Lotus@crd.lotus.comi18ngrp
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Koen Holtman wrote: > Accept-Charset has no wildcard in 1.1 because of an oversight, not because > the http-wg had a long discussion in which it was decided to omit it. I > think a strong case can be made for adding the wildcard in the next revision > of the HTTP/1.1 specification (which will be in 4 months I think). Someone > would have to write a small internet draft to make this happen. Writing an internet draft to document the problems surrounding internationalization in the current draft has been suggested as a conclusion to other discussions. At present, I count 6 issues, of course not all of them with equal degree of consensus. I would be willing to write them together as an internet-draft; anybody willing to help??? Anybody afraid of me writing this draft, because I have my own oppinion on certain issues? I would prefer to limit the discussion to http-wg, because this is most directly concerned, and I don't want to get the same mail more than two times. A preliminary title would be draft-ietf-http-i18n-issues-00.txt. Does anybody have any better idea? Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 13 January 1997 11:45:18 UTC