- From: Jurgen Bettels <jbettels@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 09:14:19 -0800
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
- CC: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>, ftang@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-international@www10.w3.org, Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com, bobj@netscape.com, Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr, Ed_Batutis/CAM/Lotus@crd.lotus.comi18ngrp.netscape.com
Martin, I would prefer not to bundle the ACCEPT-CHARSET * clarification with other issues where there is less consensus. I am still hoping that Koen can simply introduce this into the next revision without having to go through an RFC. Jürgen. Martin J. Duerst wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Koen Holtman wrote: > > > Accept-Charset has no wildcard in 1.1 because of an oversight, not because > > the http-wg had a long discussion in which it was decided to omit it. I > > think a strong case can be made for adding the wildcard in the next revision > > of the HTTP/1.1 specification (which will be in 4 months I think). Someone > > would have to write a small internet draft to make this happen. > > Writing an internet draft to document the problems surrounding > internationalization in the current draft has been suggested as > a conclusion to other discussions. At present, I count 6 issues, > of course not all of them with equal degree of consensus. > > I would be willing to write them together as an internet-draft; > anybody willing to help??? Anybody afraid of me writing this > draft, because I have my own oppinion on certain issues? > I would prefer to limit the discussion to http-wg, because this > is most directly concerned, and I don't want to get the same > mail more than two times. A preliminary title would be > draft-ietf-http-i18n-issues-00.txt. Does anybody have any > better idea? > > Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 13 January 1997 12:14:35 UTC