- From: Sebastian Mendel <lists@sebastianmendel.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:38:14 +0200
- CC: w3-html <www-html@w3.org>
David Dorward schrieb: > > On 1 Jul 2008, at 16:57, Sebastian Mendel wrote: >> in opposite to class, which could be changed to change styling, naming >> is something to rely on what does not change, see above > > As mentioned, you can change the name of an element to change the styling. > >> (in an abstract view ... objects in software are always an abstraction >> of objects in real world, and classes and names are two different >> things on real world objects, and this has a reason, sometimes you >> need to specify a group of objects by its name and sometimes by its >> class) > > In object orientated programming, if you want to get multiple objects, > then you would store them in an array (or some other kind of object). I > don't think I've ever encountered a way of accessing multiple objects > from a single name. > >> naming and classifying objects are two different approaches for me > > > I don't see how. > > There are two cases that I can see. > > (1) You get an object. This can be done by its id. > > (2) You get a group of objects that have something in common. The class > describes what they have in common. > > Your name approach seems (to me) to be purely a matter of perception, it > doesn't add any capabilities. okay ... -- Sebastian Mendel
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 16:38:55 UTC