- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:49:51 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- cc: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, www-html@w3.org
On 24 Apr, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> The WHATWG does not want a presentational language! We want a useful
> and practical language. We have not introduced any new presentational
A useful and practical *what* kind of language?
> markup into the language, but the decision to retain B and I was a
> pragmatic one.
You have not only retained B and I. You've changed them to have a
semantic interpretation not consistent with either their original
definition or their use in the wild.
> We also don't want to add semantic elements just for the sake of
> semantics. We have, however, added semantics that have real use cases.
And discarded other - real - use cases.
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net
+46 708 557 905
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:50:04 UTC