- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:08:15 -0500
- To: Kelly <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- CC: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, "Paul Nelson (ATC)" <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>, www-html@w3.org
Kelly wrote: > On Monday, April 02, 2007 5:37 pm Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > >> There is no justification for "tag soup out" systems. >> They just transfer the problem of interpretation to an assortment of >> idiosyncratic user agents. >> > > Yes, I thought the point of XHTML was to transfer AWAY from HTML-as-tag-soup > by forcing the XML conformance rules on authors... > It absolutely was, and is. Note that XHTML (all versions) *requires* that documents are valid. If a document is not valid, it is NOT XHTML. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 01:08:32 UTC