- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:08:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Shane McCarron wrote: > > It absolutely was, and is. Note that XHTML (all versions) *requires* > that documents are valid. If a document is not valid, it is NOT XHTML. Well, it's XHTML, just not valid XHTML. Invalid XHTML, if you will. But the more important concern is conformance, not validity. Validity doesn't check for most conformance requirements (e.g. attribute values aren't checked for conformance). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 02:08:42 UTC