- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:22:26 +0200
- To: W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
> * Steven Pemberton wrote: >> Modularization certainly does serve a purpose, for instance keeping a >> handle on different language profiles, such as XHTML Basic, Print and >> 1.1, and documenting extension points to ease the process of >> combining >> different schemas, as Masayasu Ishikawa demonstrated in his >> XHTML+MathML+SVG profile (http://www.w3.org/TR/ >> XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/), >> therefore making it easier to define extensions (or contractions) >> to XHTML. I may be totally missing the point, but how does the Modularization make creating modified DTDs/schemas easier than duplicating a monolithic DTD/schema and adding or removing stuff? It appears that subsetters may want to subset in ways different from those that were not recommended by the HTML WG anyway: http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0071.html#profile-text -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 08:22:37 UTC