- From: Paolo Candelari <paolo.candelari@fastwebnet.it>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:46:32 +0200
- To: +ACI-html list+ACI +ADw-www-html+AEA-w3.org+AD4
Sorry but I respond only to Shane, and not to the list. So I'm forwarding this email. I have a doubt, is this a thread relevant to www-html-editor list? Regards Paolo ----- Original Message ----- From: +ACI-Paolo Candelari+ACI- +ADw-paolo.candelari+AEA-fastwebnet.it+AD4- To: +ACI-Shane McCarron+ACI- +ADw-shane+AEA-aptest.com+AD4- Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: Re: name attribute deprecated in XHTML +AD4- ----- Original Message ----- +AD4- From: +ACI-Shane McCarron+ACI- +ADw-shane+AEA-aptest.com+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Well.... It says it is +ACI-deprecated+ACI- and will be removed. In fact, it +AD4- +AD4- was then removed in XHTML 1.1. You should only use the name attribute +AD4- +AD4- on these elements in your XHTML 1.0 documents if you are serving those +AD4- +AD4- documents up as text/html and are trying to ensure that your documents +AD4- +AD4- are backward compatible to HTML 4 browsers. ..... +AD4- +AD4- Probably I expressed my idea bad. +AD4- +AD4- What I'd like to say is if name attribute is deprecated in XHTLM 1.0 why +AD4- talking about this in section 4.10 that is informative and not normative? +AD4- +AD4- Generally deprecated elements or attributes are inserted in transitional dtd +AD4- (or this is the case for HTML 4.01), but in XHTLM 1.0 name attributes is +AD4- defined both in strict and transitional dtd. +AD4- +AD4- I think it's more exact to insert that statement in a normative section, +AD4- because, how I cited, XHTML refers itself to HTLM for semantic and talk +AD4- aboute a deprecated use of name only for form and image elements. +AD4- +AD4- That's all. +AD4- +AD4- Bye. +AD4- +AD4- Paolo. +AD4- ***************************************************************** Questa e-mail, ed i suoi eventuali allegati, contengono informazioni confidenziali e riservate. Se avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore non utilizzatene il contenuto e non portatelo a conoscenza di alcuno. Siete inoltre pregati di elimi- narla dalla vostra casella e avvisare il mittente. E' da rilevare inoltre che l'attuale infrastruttura tecnologica non puo' garantire l'autenticita' del mittente, ne' tanto- meno l'integrita' dei contenuti.Opinioni, conclusioni ed altre informazioni contenu- te nel messaggio possono rappresentare punti di vista personali a meno di diversa esplicita indicazione autorizzata. *****************************************************************
Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 08:46:51 UTC