RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft

Daniel wrote:

> Sorry, but I still do not like XHTML 2.0. By the way, it __kills__ me
> to see that a W3C WG is releasing a W3C Draft with no XML DTD, based
> on the W3C Rec XML, nor any Schema based on the W3C XML Schema Rec,
> but only a RELAX NG implementation based on an OASIS spec. Is it a
> really **W3C** Working Group ? 

The sample RNG driver in the WD is neat.   Is a W3C Working Group required
to suffer from NIH syndrome?


Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 19:06:06 UTC