- From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 12:02:32 +1000 (EST)
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
> Sorry, but I still do not like XHTML 2.0. By the way, it __kills__ me to see > that a W3C WG is releasing a W3C Draft with no XML DTD, based on the W3C Rec > XML, nor any Schema based on the W3C XML Schema Rec, but only a RELAX NG > implementation based on an OASIS spec. Is it a really **W3C** Working Group ? Yeah, basing all those specs on ISO SGML was a bad idea too. And it's definitely time for the W3C to develop their own character set and encodings, rather than relying on UNICODE. As for PNG, hah! Oh wait, I was being sarcastic. I think using a RELAX NG schema is a good choice, and it will be interesting to see if it ends up being more readable and understandable than the very complicated HTML DTDs with modularisation and parameter entities all over the place. Michael Day -- YesLogic Prince prints XML! http://yeslogic.com/prince
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 20:40:10 UTC