- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:59:23 +0100
- To: "Reinthaler, Frank" <Frank.Reinthaler@auspost.com.au>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20030331165922.GA12297@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:02:28PM +1000, Reinthaler, Frank wrote: | Perhaps because by enforcing the use of <meta name="DC.Title" /> we are | enforcing the use of the Dublin Core standard whereas authors may wish to | use other metadata schemes? It is possible to mix and match several metadata schemes. There is nothing to stop a document using a few DC's and a few AC's. Whatsmore, use of the <title /> element is just another metadata scheme. We are already forcing people to use this metadata scheme, so what's so wrong about forcing the use of a different scheme instead. Once more, I say... scrap the <title/> element! You know it makes sense! | Also how do you make mandatory the use of the attribute and value | 'name="DC.Title"' for the meta element in the DTD? I don't know much about DTDs, but presumably we can make it mandatory in the same way that we make 'xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"' mandatory for all XHTML1.1 documents. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/conformance.html#strict -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://(nothing)
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 11:59:31 UTC