- From: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:27:25 -0400
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Brian Bober wrote: :: This is obviously an old issue, but couldn't we add :: "shortcut icon" or just "icon" and "shorcut" meaning the same thing (and :: working if placed together) into :: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links? rel="shortcut icon" defines two relationships, 'shortcut' and 'icon'. A definition of rel="icon" would suffice. rel="shortcut" isn't an appropriate relationship between a document and an icon, since "shortcut" is IE's synonym for "bookmark". Better to leave "shortcut" undefined and ignored.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:24:10 UTC