- From: Arthur Wiebe <webmaster@awiebe.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:20:44 -0400
- To: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>, www-html@w3.org
Robin Lionheart wrote: >Brian Bober wrote: >:: This is obviously an old issue, but couldn't we add >:: "shortcut icon" or just "icon" and "shorcut" meaning the same thing (and >:: working if placed together) into >:: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links? > >rel="shortcut icon" defines two relationships, 'shortcut' and 'icon'. > >A definition of rel="icon" would suffice. > >rel="shortcut" isn't an appropriate relationship between a document and an >icon, since "shortcut" is IE's synonym for "bookmark". Better to leave >"shortcut" undefined and ignored. > > > > > rel="icon" should be added to the spec. It is already supported by Mozilla, I don't know if IE supports it or not. <Arthur/>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 18:37:49 UTC