- From: <veith.risak@chello.at>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:07:03 +0100
- To: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
- Cc: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, <www-html@w3.org>
I think, that the structure of <h1>, <h2>, ... should make it easier to write "pure hierarchical" documents. If you agree than only one <h1> is possible. "Unrelated topics" should not be at the first level on a page. I prefer one common topic (with <h1>) and then the subtopics as <h2>. If it is not possible to find a common topic, why not use two separate pages? Kind regards V. Risak Univ. of Salzburg risak@cosy.sbg.ac.at > > Von: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi> > Datum: 2003/02/12 Mi PM 11:08:46 GMT+01:00 > An: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com> > CC: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, www-html@w3.org > Betreff: RE: H1 > > > On 2003-02-12, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design uttered to Sampo Syreeni: > > >But if they're unrelated shouldn't they be on separate pages in theory? > > There's no such rule. Pages are pages, and if somebody thinks unrelated > topics should be on the same page, well, what can we do about it? > -- > Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111 > student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front > openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2 > >
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 05:19:47 UTC