- From: Jared Warren <warren@cs.queensu.ca>
- Date: 12 Feb 2003 17:58:07 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
> > So you shouldn't be putting navigation > > hints or advertisements, or whatever else some of the other posters > > would call their garbage. > Of course you should, in practice the <title> is used as the default name > for bookmarks and is usually displayed as the title of a search results > listing, so putting your site name there makes the document more usable as > it helps users to identify it. Your entire point is about how you'd like things to *look*, not what you want them to *mean*. Books usually put the title of the book in the header rather than the chapter title -- this is a style on the metadata. The name of your site is *seperate metadata*, not part of the title. If I wanted to print a collection of pages from your site, I might have to write a script to rip your crap out of the TITLE rather than just putting some overrides in the @page styles... What makes you think that the name of your site is more important than the title of the page? For example: if I'm reading Google News the source of the information is only my second consideration -- I can get nearly (exactly?) the same info from any number of news outlets. If I pass a zine article onto a friend it's usually that specific article rather than the zine. Finally, consider the childr^H^H^H^H^H^H disabled: how would you like to have your webpage reader tell you: "You are listening to 'The Raven': The Raven, By..." Why is the title there twice unless the inner title is the title of a subsection?! ~ Jared Warren Computing Science, Queen's University
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:58:09 UTC