- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 20:40:20 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> object takes the file and treats it like a movie or media file. It > doesn't just simply insert the code which would work a lot better. In what way would it work better? > > > Using SSI the file has to be on the same domain. That is my reason for > passing it. Cross domain inclusion tends to involve severe copyright problems. Are you the person who posted on a similar topic recently and clearly didn't believe in the right of anyone to impose copyright restrictions? Whether or not that is the case, it is fairly clear you have a non-standard requirement. You need to explain the underlying requirement, probably justify why XHTML 2 should cater for that requirement, and then give your proposed solution to the requirement that would benefit from a new feature, and if not then obvious, why existing mechanism won't work. If you are proposing cross-domain inclusion, you also need to explain the security model under which it will work.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 16:37:05 UTC