Re: OL needs the start attribute from Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] on 2002-10-17 (www-html@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:29:44 +0100
To: Andrew McFarland <andrew.mcfarland@unite.net>, "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3DAE8308.F8DE70C1@Rhul.Ac.Uk>

Andrew McFarland wrote:

[snip]

> Being able to associate the two parts of the list - by giving the two ol
> elements the same name attribute for example - would solve both the
> numbering problem and the association problem here.

Oh, that's /clever/ : it certainly makes far better sense than
any of the "start" ideas postulated so far for the case you 
discuss, which is also the case that most frequently causes
me to wish for a "start" attribute.

Philip Taylor, RHBNC

Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 05:34:33 UTC