- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:08:59 -0500
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
In this case, it SHOULD be treated as HTML. We are talking about web developers who are writing outdated HTML. -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of John Lewis Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:37 PM To: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Promotion of XHTML Peter wrote on Monday, December 30, 2002 at 10:54:07 AM: > How else should it be served? It *is* text, and it *is* html. application/xhtml+xml See <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt> The main problem with serving XHTML as HTML is that it's treated just like HTML. -- John
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 13:00:14 UTC