- From: Alexander Savenkov <w3@hotbox.ru>
- Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:29:00 +0300
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de>, www-html@w3.org
Hello everyone, Christoph, (quite a delayed response) >>> point is, that I use title on other elements for different tasks than >>> providing a substitute. It's inconsequent to use it as such on abbr. >> >> I quite agree, but then what you need is to rename the attribute, not >> to add another one. > title is a common attribute that should not be removed. Next time Christoph, would you please read exactly what is written, not what you want it to be? Thank you. I wasn't proposing to remove the common element, rather I was pointing to the fact you're not satisfied with the current 'title' role, thus you need to rename it. But that's just you. >>> <p xml:lang="de">Die <abbr xml:lang="en" title="Organization of >>> Petrol Exporting Countries" alt="Organisation Erdöl exportierender >>> Länder">OPEC</abbr> hat eine Verringerung der Erdölfördermenge >>> beschlossen.</p> >> >> Now you employed 'alt'. How can a UA know the 'alt' is in German? >> Well, you would say that the <p>'s language shows that. > Indeed. For the above stated example, I suggest you just provide expansion in the text in German and leave the <abbr> with 'xml:lang="en"'. Some abbreviations are never translated, e. g. NATO or UNESCO. Somewhere in the text you could explain their purpose in case your readers are not familiar with them. >> Let's look at the XML1SE more closely [1]: > Although this is about XHTML2, I guess it's already such defined in XML 1.0. >> "A special attribute named xml:lang may be inserted in documents to >> specify the language used in the contents >>>and attribute values<<< >> of any element in an XML document." > Wasn't it possible to override this in the spec? You don't want this, do you? XML is the basis, who would "override" it? >>> The need for pre is becoming less, but it's still there. >> >> I don't think so. If you really need those ascii-poems or passages >> from some other fixed-width source use paragraphs and CSS. > That's not correct if the poem layout carries meaning, thus at most using > would be okay. Why nbsp? Use 'white-space: pre' in your CSS sheet. >>>>> 10. XHTML List Module >>>>> name ist not only a bad choice, >> >>> it's been renamed to label, already, >> >> Reminds me of the form elements. Not a good choice either. > ACK. If anyone from the WG is reading this, could you please provide reasoning for naming it <label>, not <caption> in the 3rd WD? Regards, --- Alexander "Croll" Savenkov http://www.thecroll.com/ w3@hotbox.ru http://croll.da.ru/
Received on Wednesday, 25 December 2002 05:30:01 UTC