- From: Daniel Hiester <alatus@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:22:35 -0700
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Well I think that an interesting aspect here is that technically, this is the W3C list to discuss XHTML on (am I not correct?), and has the benefit of involvement from the people who make the decisions on what XHTML is and will be. On the one hand, a haven dedicated to discussing XHTML is an exciting thing, and it really is. I know a lot of people have a lot of faith that reformulating mainstream web markup into modular XML will open a lot of doors, and I share that belief... But I don't have all the time in the world, and so I'd have to choose between that list and this one... and I choose this one, because I can see where the W3C members are coming from, and I can make myself heard if I have any concerns. I think it's great that the W3C is modularizing markup, and I hope that people who think otherwise (or disagree with the W3C on a lot of other issues) will be able to understand why the W3C is doing things they way they are doing, even if some people don't understand, by simply _being on this list_. If you have the time to go on both lists... well, I don't think that _anyone_ here would discourage that. Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2000 18:20:27 UTC