- From: Beth Skwarecki <skwareea@screech.cs.alfred.edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:19:48 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
> Lastly, of course, who would use soemthing as simple as notepad or wordpad > when they could be using a powerful "editor" such as X/Emacs :) xemacs is nice, but its color-coding is so generic as to barely be aware that you're dealing with an HTML document. I've been using screem a lot lately - it's a HTML-specific text editor with a bunch of nifty features, including the whole drag-and-drop site management stuff and toolbars to format text (you select the text, click the "bold" button, it puts <b> tags around your text) - also some wizards, support for scp as well as ftp, thumbnail generators, all sorts of really nice features but with a text editor to do the actual coding. This isn't a slam against xemacs. I love xemacs and will be using it until screem works out a few more of its bugs. --beth
Received on Monday, 11 December 2000 12:20:07 UTC