- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:16:43 -0000
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From: Dave J Woolley [SMTP:DJW@bts.co.uk] > > section 2.4 doesn't imply that &uot; gets > turned into " - the fact that it might is one reason > why I think it is unsafe) in CDATA attributes in XML. > Actually, my original comment was that section 2.4 doesn't include &, so this case is not possible. Having section 2.4 add to, rather than restate 3.3 would just result in " etc. being parsed earlier, but with no obvious change in the net semantics. I definitely think this bit of 2.4 causes unnecessary confusion.
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 1999 15:19:03 UTC