- From: Brian White <blwhite@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:42:09 +1000 (EST)
- To: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>, "Inanis Brooke" <alatus@earthlink.net>
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 1999 22:43:02 UTC
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:28:11 -0800, Inanis Brooke wrote: >This, for me, brings up a more important question: are iframes in any w3c >official recommendation? IE3 as a web browser was, as I see it, ahead of its >time: no one understood its features which leaped so far ahead from NS3, >that people actually thought IE3 didn't have any features at all. My >understanding has always been that iframe was something MS made just for >IE3. >If iframes aren't in any current draft, does anyone know if the html (or xml >/ html-in-xml) working group(s) is/are considering this? I'm neutral either >way... just curious. The current W3C specification for HTML 4 certainly provides for them. Their specifications for frames (including iframes) are attached. Brian White _______________________________________ Brian White & Associates Organisation and Management Consulting 17 Foveaux Street AINSLIE ACT 2602 AUSTRALIA Telephone 61-2-6257-3020 Facsimile 61-2-6257-3448 Mobile 0413 693 444 Email blwhite@ozemail.com.au _______________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 1999 22:43:02 UTC