- From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@heeten.nl>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 13:44:51 +0100
- To: "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
I don't think programmers will cheat so they pass the test. BUT when the w3c issues an official browser test, programmers will test their beta-browser on it, and tweaking the code until it passes the test. Programmers may incorrectly think that passing the test means a 100% working browser. This means that issuing an official browser test may even ENCOURAGE BUGGY CODE. Think about it. Sjoerd Visscher - sjoerd@locosoft.nl Locosoft bv - www.locosoft.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of Gordon Worley > Sent: vrijdag 8 januari 1999 04:08 > To: Inanis Brooke; www-html > Subject: Re: I can't code, but... > > > Inanis Broke wrote: > > >A test suite sounds like a good idea, as long as it's "cheat > proof." For me, > > This is part of why I would want the code for the browser, as I > mentioned several e-mails ago earlier in this thread. Cheating could > possibly become an issue, since I would assume that the testing process > would be avaliable for public review. With this knowledge, > Netscape could, > for instance, make sure that the proper Java data bindings to make the > OBJECT element work with specific mime types are built into the > browser and > work only during the W3C's test, keeping their certificate system in tact. > While I realize that it is unlikely that browser makers would want to > implement features that would pass only the test, it would be necessary to > be ready for all situations. > > >though, the question still remains: if we all really want a program to > >encourage better conformance to w3c standards, (i.e. "100% HTML4/CSS > >Compliance," or 90% or 80%, etc,) how do we go about at least letting the > >w3c / Web industry know that we think it's a good idea, or > finding out if / > >why the w3c / Web industry thinks that such a program intended > to encourage > >full w3c compliance as fast as possible is a bad idea? > > I'll leave this on to the W3C people on the list. > > >Also, does anyone know if there are pages showing information about the > >development or existence of test suites similar to the one for CSS1 which > >currently exists? > > I don't know of any pages, but there are a few people I am going to > try to contact that may be able to provide this type of information. If > they are willing, mabey they will even collaborate with the W3C on the > project. Will report back on this later. > > ________________________________________ > Red Bird Island Productions > Gordon Worley > http://www.crosswinds.net/orlando/~redbird/ > mailto:redbird@orlando.crosswinds.net > >
Received on Saturday, 9 January 1999 07:45:40 UTC