- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 20:36:58 -0700
- To: David Siegel <dave@verso.com>, Peter Fraterdeus <peterf@mail.dol.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
At 19:19 -0700 5.5.97, David Siegel wrote: > I definitely would argue against a <Q> tag, because it's not metadata. Sure it is. It says: "the enclosed bit is in another voice - render as appropriate". It should replace <blockquote> now that CSS lets you say whether an element should be rendered block or inline. Or is that the idea? Get rid of <b> and <align>, as well? In typesetting, the decision whether to render a quotation block or inline usually has something to do with length - number of lines. Without knowing how lines might break in a given instance, authors can't confidently tag a quotation "block". Nor can they style the element appropriately without scripting to work out the parameters. ________________________________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com http://www.verso.com/ The printed page transcends space and time. The printed page, the infinitude of books, must be transcended. THE ELECTRO-LIBRARY. --El Lissitzky, 1923
Received on Monday, 5 May 1997 23:27:46 UTC