- From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 06:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com> > > At 11:35a +0200 06/15/97, Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote: > > 1) it breaks all other clients, as RFC 1738 defines the value of > > mailto to be an email address only. Thus, mail from those clients > > will bounce, as "htmlhelp.com?subject=hello" is not a valid host. > > So update the client -- it's easy to add support for this. Perhaps it > would also be good form to "mark" enhanced mailtos as such, so the user > can be aware of the extra params if using an old client. > > True enough. Even Lynx handles that kind of markup... More to the point - the clients that are that old have bigger problems to face: Such as the ongoing deployment of 'shared-IP' webservers. If they *don't* upgrade they will find the web becoming simply inaccessible. I expect within 2 years that anyone using a client that doesn't send 'Host:' will be completely off the web for all intents and purposes. I find the 'mailto' thing to be a dying thing anyway. For contacts I nearly always use forms. It seems more professional and *significantly* reduces the amount of email I recieve from web-crawling spambots daily. Oh - another thing that helps reduce spam is using '@' on webpages for visible text spelling out of email addresses.... ;-) -- Benjamin Franz
Received on Monday, 16 June 1997 09:57:24 UTC