- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 01:54:11 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 9:23a +0100 07/31/97, Brian Kelly wrote: > > Well, In the HTML4.0 draft I was surprised to see the way that the term > > "acronym" was being interpreted. > > Re. the discussion on acronyms and initialisms, what is VRML (Virtual > Reality Markup Language)? The VRML FAQ (F-AY-QUEUE or Fack?) states that > this should be pronounced "vermel". However most people I know in the UK > treat it like HTML and spell out the initials. I don't know anyone who > pronounces HTML as "hit-mell", although URL is pronounced YOU-ARE-ELL > and "earl" (the latter seems to be favoured by many Scots I know). Oh boy... there are lots of similar examples. In electronics, there are the Light-Emitting Diodes, or LEDs. I have always pronounced it ELL-ee-DEE, but I know someone who pronounces it "led". In banking, there is the IRA account which I refuse to pronounce like a person's name! I say i-ar-ay instead, just like that naughty Irish group. This all illustrates the fact that the decision to pronounce or not is quite separate from the acronym itself. Thus, whether [any] people pronounce an acronym or not should not affect the actual definition of an acronym. IMO. __________________________________________________________________________ Walter Ian Kaye <boo_at_best*com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Thursday, 31 July 1997 04:54:57 UTC