- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil.kjernsmo@astro.uio.no>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:08:32 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Dear all! I am pretty new to this list, but have tried to search archives and other documents for the stuff I am proposing here as instructed. It isn't easy to search though, so I hope what I bring hasn't been debated. Nor am I very experienced with programming. I've been writing HTML for three years, and that is about all. From the drafts, it seems the W3C are concerned with Big Things, I just propose a few small things I think would make a big difference. Keywords: images with lists, formatting of lists, enumeration, indentation, keywords with links. It has become quite common to use some graphical dots in unumbered lists. My university has begun using it in the graphical profile (which is a profile I dislike) at http://www.uio.no/ I haven't been using it, but there are instances where it would be allright I think to have. Therefore, I would like to propose a new tag for <ul>, src (or img, imgsrc or something), so for example a list with green dots could be <ul src="greendot.gif">. Normal dots should be displayed before the dot is loaded, or by non-graphical browsers. If the type-attribute is used, it would be the alternate "text". We could, of course, take this further, and make <li> have a src attribute too. Some might think this is taking it too far, but I have a typical use for it. I am a norwegian, and host quite a few articles in both norwegian and english. I usually indicate what language the document that a link points to by a tiny flag somewhere. It would have been very convienient if I could use <ul> and <li src="enflag.gif"> for this purpose. It should be possible to make this work with <ol> as well. Would it be possible load images after a pattern, using wildcards? If you had a set if files, say no1.gif, no2.gif, no3.gif etc. and you gave the <ol src="no*.gif">. The first <li> would display no1.gif, the second no2.gif an so on. And now, to the format. If you have a long list of say, names (they are normally not so long), it tends to take up a lot of space. It would often be desireable to brake them up in coloumns. Today, it is possible using tables to get the format 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. I feel it is a little awkward to do it this way, and I would like to have 1. 4. 7. 2. 5. 8. 3. 6. 9. as well. Actually, I think a numbered list could be a part of the text, like 1. apples 2. oranges 3. other fruit. I think it would be good to be able to use <li> in this situation as well. It is always nice when you doesn't have to count. I propose yet a few attributes to <ol>, format or something like that, the number of coloumns or rows. For example, the first list would be <ol format=horizontal cols=3>, the second <ol format=vertical rows=3> and the third <ol format=text>. I started publishing transcripts of our meetings in the physics students union 2.5 years ago, and tried to get the administration to do the same. Now they are instructed to do so from "above", and I am standing here to welcome them. Anyway, they argued two years ago that HTML wasn't good because it couldn't be used to numerate cases like "EC-5-95" (Which means Executive Committee case number 5, 1995"). I would like to see yet another attribute (or do something with type) to <ol>, where you can specify more in detail how an item is numbered. <ul type="EC-#1#-95"> could for example indicate the example above. And you should be able to enter start value, if you don't want it to start at 1. It is always nice not to keep the count, and I would like to see LaTeX-style enumration. Guess some might argue it is against the fundamentals of hypertext because you don't need numbers to reference another section of the document. Any thoughts? Like many others, I have been using background images with "something" along the left margin, like a logo, or something fancy. And I have been wanting to indent the text somewhat for most of the document. I have been using <ul> for this purpose, but that is clearly not what it has been ment for. MS Frontpage, I have seen, uses <blockquote> which is no better, I think. I figured, it might be a good idea to introduce something that has the its sole purpose to do this. I figure an attribute to <div> might be a good idea. (And to body maybe.) <div indent=[number of pixels or a percentage]>. Just <div indent> could cause the same indent as <ul> or <blockquote> normally does. I was thinking about maybe adding keywords to hypertext links. My main motivation for this is that I am about to begin making a hierarchal directory of science and critical thinking links for norwegian skeptics. And I am going to expand the site with a search engine later, so I got to have keywords somewhere, and I thought, why not store them in the html files itself? I thought I might store it as a comment, but after reading the WD-htmllink-970328, I figured, it might be convienient to have a keyword attribute to <a> It may have about the same uses as the title attribute. I thought in the future, smart browsers could use the keywords to load a page into the cache while the user is still reading. Maybe that would increase network traffic too much, I don't know. It could use the keywords from the last pages read to guess which link is the next link the user would click. The <link rel=next> tag would of course be a very good place to look, but that is only obvious as long as the text is pretty linear (isn't it what they call it?) A LANG-attribute to <a> would also be nice, I guess. I would have to indicate somewhere what language the link points to has anyway, and it would be nice to do it in the <a>. I have seen, it is being worked with printing stuff, and separate documents can be used for printing. I have been thinking for a while about a <feet>-tag. I mean, you are supposed to have head, body _and_ feet... :-) I thought maybe, everything written between <feet> and </feet> would be displayed, but not printed. Navigational buttons is an example of stuff that could be put between <feet>-tags. But since this tag could be used anywhere in the body, the name isn't such a good idea... Maybe these are things that go into the stylesheet stuff? I have admittedly not been looking at that at all. Friendly Tiddely-pom, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo astronomy-student (B.Sc.) University of Oslo, Norway mailto:kjetikj@astro.uio.no WWW-homepage:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/ President, Norwegian Association of Physics Students Webmaster@skepsis.no
Received on Monday, 28 July 1997 10:07:55 UTC