- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 01 Jan 1997 21:49:06 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
Fine, then please suggest something else that the average HTML author should use. For many people, the only way to make sure they write valid HTML is to use a validator. I really can't write 1,200 documents without some way of automated syntax checking. I appreciate your dilemma. To make this useful, the validator has to support the "latest" elements and attributes. I think that HTML 3.2 provides a good overview of what currently can be done, so that is why I recommend it as the HTML level to validate against. I misunderstood you...I thought you were advocating 3.2 as the current 'most advanced state'. ///Peter
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 1997 16:49:35 UTC